When I play a strategy games, oh heck, Everygame feels like a strategy game, I struggle to find the best, THE ABSOLUTE BEST, solution. It is alot like A Beautiful Mind when John Nash gets outraged that he lost. It is mistaken that he would be upset to loose, but that is clearly not the issue at that point. It is because statistically it would be impossible. If every step was perfect it would win, right, so, he chose accordingly each time and the promised result did not measure up.
Switching gears for a moment... I was quite upset and the way we use what we know to explain things that we do not and create according to what we lack. I think it is called circular reasoning.
This morning, I realized how thankful I was that I actually knew the big answers to lifes enormous questions. That is when I thought of a game we used to play as children, called "Woof" it was purposed to tease my baby brother who always asked "What if..." but, it sounded like woof. So I asked "woof there was something that made love seem meaningless?" I do not know what it would be but, I was imagining, that love had been propogated as the explination for why of everything like God is Love or Love is God and God is in everything. There a solution for everything. But, what would an alternative be to love? And is it too comfortable to consider existance without it? Like why must we procreate? I do not know yet, but I certainly need to try to explain things without love just too see what the end consequence would be... cause we see with John Nash how trusting in a consequence might not always work out...hey, just a thought, but isn't that sort of like a "Dark Horse"? I am using the pronoun that to refer to an alternative explination.
2 comments:
I also had the communicative property on my mind from doing homework "word problems" with my son where 2 plus 5 equal (or is)7 or 7 is 5 plus 2.
Hence God equals (is) Love or Love is God.
Post a Comment