Tonight, I was musing myself with various cliche's. The one I entirely do not believe is true is the one that says it is,better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all.
My first example is a young chick who is fat and ugly, but has one feature that is nice like the muscle tone that makes a cute dimple on her back. Then there is another girl who has,always been as if not prettier than almost anyone around, so as the both age the latter girl is so dissatisfied with her appearance, which is still a million times prettier than average or the other fatter girl, but the first girl was,never seen as pretty anyway and so it is no big deal to her but the latter girl goes though a severe depression.
The next example is an star pupil who managed to graduate with a 5.5 GPA and got a full scholarship in engineering to an ivy league school, and his best friend was salutatorion in his graduating class of 68 people, and gets a great, high paying Job right out of high school and ends up running for office and becoming a governor and he passes a law that states that students may only get scholarships in their own state of residence. So, the first boy cannot afford to go to the school he wants and instead works as a laborer in a local factory, falls in love and gets married, living check to check. Both loose their memory as they age but which has greater cause to mourn?
Ok, now that you have been away for a story or two, think about the coulple who was really in love but a spouse died opposed to an unmarried woman and who's story is really the saddest or worst?
http://youtu.be/pZufpM3Qjq0
Instead, I favor the notion that ignorance is bliss and it is better to just not know what you are missing.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment